SEC dynastic rule continues

FORT LAUDERDALE–The defining moments seem to come in 10-year increments in the Southeastern Conference.

Take that time in 1992 when Alabama, having been taken to the max by Florida in a 28-21 victory  in the first ever SEC title game, appeared to have nothing left in the tank when it faced No. 1 Miami in the national championship game.

Then Alabama coach Gene Stallings groused about the difficulty of playing a tough SEC schedule, and then having to prove it over again in an SEC title game, told a reporter that the title game format doomed the SEC into “never winning a national championship” again.

A month later, Alabama stunned many people by upsetting No. 1 Miami 34-13 to win another national title for the Tide and the SEC.

Fast forward the time line to 2004 when Auburn, coming out of the ranks of contenders, finishes a 12-0 regular season, but finds itself tucked into a No. 3 spot behind  USC and Oklahoma and is shut out of a title game opportunity.

SEC commissioner Mike Slive is fuming, vowing never to ever have an unbeaten SEC champion locked out of a national title game opportunity. The league will get bigger and better.

It takes a year, but starting in January of 2007 when No. 2 Florida rolls over No. 1 Ohio State starts winning bowl games and national championships.

Following Monday night’s 42-14 win by No. 2 Alabama over No. 1 Notre Dame, the championship run count is 7. And there is no end in sight since the Tide, which has created a dynasty within a dynasty by winning three national titles in the last four seasons and  back to back titles, will be the pre-season favorite in 2013 to three-peat.

Just how does the SEC and Alabama and Tide coach Nick Saban, who now has four national titles (3 at Alabama and 1 at LSU), accomplish this, sometimes making it look easy?

Part of the reason may be the toughness of the SEC itself.

I don’t think there’s any question about it,” said Saban on Tuesday in a morning after press conference following the rout of ND.  “” We had some really tough games with‑‑ I think, weren’t there six teams in the top ten at the end of the season, five maybe?  I don’t know, I thought there were six when we played the SEC Championship game.
So if you’re playing those teams, and we didn’t play all five of them or six of them or however many there were, but we played a couple, three of them, those kinds of games, that kind of competition, playing against sort of the best, obviously helps you play another good team when you play in a game like this.  And I don’t even think it’s just those teams, I think it’s the fact that there’s a lot of teams in our division that we had very difficult games with.  So it’s almost every game that you play in the SEC is a game that you could lose, and you have to be very well prepared for and you have to sort of play with a consistency.””

Now it is 2013 and the SEC is the monster in the room of college football that EVERYONE is talking about.

How could it be any other way?  SEC teams are bigger, better, faster, with better facilities in many cases than most of their brethren. It has television appeal, and a large rabid fan base. Mostly, however, it has a success ratio that is off even off the boards in the most complicated charts, monitoring significant wins and losses.

Alabama’s win over ND, upped the SEC’s record in BCS type of championship games over the past 20 years to 9-0.

There is more than chatter in SEC circles that the winner of the SEC title game in Atlanta each year needs  generally has a tougher time in Atlanta than they do after the game. t

Listen to Saban talk about the Tide’s SEC title game victory over Georgia. “The process is ongoing,” said Saban, who has taken Alabama to back-to-back national titles, something no one has accomplished in the BCS era. “And if you don’t pay attention to that, you’re not going to stay up. We got here (national championship) by five yards. Georgia was five yards away from scoring. So it’s a pretty tough league that we play in and we’re going to have to improve as a program to have an opportunity to win the SEC championship or National championship ever again because of the competition in our league.”

Alabama, under Saban, seems to do that better anyone else. He has four national championships. He makes in excess of $5 million a year. He has security and success. Will he allow himself time to enjoy the moment?

Saban said he is giving himself 24 hours and then the clock will resume ticking. “We are 0-0,” he said, referring to the record Bama will have when it begins playing games next season.

But right now that 0-0 still is better than anyone else’s–even in the ever-so-tough SEC.

© 2013, Mark. All rights reserved.

  3 comments for “SEC dynastic rule continues

  1. March 26, 2013 at 5:32 pm

    It’s awesome in favor of me to have a website, which is beneficial designed for my experience. thanks admin

  2. March 4, 2013 at 10:44 am

    Hey would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a
    lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good internet hosting provider at
    a reasonable price? Thanks a lot, I appreciate it!

    My web site :: Immigration Lawyers in Ilford

  3. Jamie Barnes
    January 9, 2013 at 10:36 pm

    I’m a Texas A&M fan and have always also pulled for Arkansas and LSU of the SEC. I don’t dislike anybody in the conference, including Alabama. I have an enormous amount of respect for Saban, his very comprehensive, meticulous approach toward annually trying to achieve excellence. It’s a body of work that transcends college football, transcends sports, even.

    Having said all that, the SEC as an entity is WAYYYYYYYY overrated, and I get sick of hearing it even though I now live within SEC territory. All the attention to the SEC obscures that the SEC includes several very good, unique individual programs that really set the tone, carry the mantle and perpetuate the myth and reality of the SEC as the best college football conference. Even in the current 7-year run of SEC dominance in the BCS title game, it’s really only a story of: One dynasty with one of the best leaders in the history of college football (Alabama); One very special program with a quirky coach that is fascinating even when it underachieving (LSU); One resilient program that appears to be on the rebound after benefiting from, then losing two of the best coaches in the game since 2001 (Florida); and one flash in the pan that experienced the perfect storm for a season (Auburn).

    South Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas and Texas A&M have also contributed in the last seven seasons to the SEC’s aura of national dominance, but none of those teams have as much won the conference title game during that period. So, the picture of dominance from a national standpoint in the SEC is really relegated to Alabama, LSU and Florida, and the latter is still a little suspect after losing to a 2-loss Louisville in the Sugar Bowl.

    So, two teams. You reference 2004, when undefeated Auburn was left out of the BCS title game. Auburn played a typically weak non-conference schedule. You’ll have to trust me on this, the SEC wasn’t a very good conference overall that year. One other 10-2 teams, after that, 8-4. Southern Cal was a juggernaut, played a tough non-conference schedule. Oklahoma was undefeated, and beat an 11-1 Texas team that was arguably better than Auburn, straight up.

    So, when we discuss seasons 8 or 9 years ago with the premise of building up the SEC, please let’s not forget the details.

    Plus, I don’t believe in conferences. I believe in programs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *